[ViktorasM]

Stopped reading at "Place models, views and controllers in their own folders". No worse way to organize your code than classify by behavior type. "Here are all the daos", "here is all business logic", "here are all the controllers". You add a feature as small as resource CRUD and scatter it's pieces across the whole code base.

No.

[loco5niner]

Honest question from someone with little real world experience outside .Net: This is MVC's convention, to "Place models, views and controllers in their own folders", and it's what I'm used to working with. Can you point me to resources outlining other methods (responding with google "XYZ" would be fine too).

[kentosi]

I believe it's called vertical packaging.

Package "employee" contains: EmployeeDto, EmployeeService, EmployeeController Package "order" contains: OrderDto, OrderService, OrderController

And so on. This way logic that is closely related is kept closeby.

[ellyagg]

Organize projects by feature:

http://jaysoo.ca/2016/02/28/organizing-redux-application/

[Roboprog]

Thank you, thank you. THIS, exactly this.

[prawks]

Django's recommended project structure is one that immediately comes to mind. A project is broken down into "applications" each which have their own models, views, and controllers (among other things like forms, tests, etc.). Each "application" is an area of responsibility within the project, like payment or user management.

As it's python, the 'views' module could technically be a folder with multiple files inside it, but they would all be grouped under their respective app.

[amirouche]

There several reasons to create a folder. The question is simplistic to me if the folder describe a `model' I call it model. If it describe a feature like "cart" I call it... `cart'...

[macca321]

A .NET take on it https://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2015/07/02/ndc-talk-on-so...

[725686]

Agree. A few years ago I read this http://olivergierke.de/2013/01/whoops-where-did-my-architect... post which made a lot of sense to me. Also this: http://www.slideshare.net/olivergierke/whoops-where-did-my-a...

[greenshackle]

The guidelines for a framework I use is to put views and models in separate folders. Which means code for any model is spread out between at least two folders. Finding code is annoying.

[amirouche]

To avoid that Django does split by "app" or feature first.

[Roboprog]

Also, be sure to repeat adjectives and other name parts as much as possible. Ideally, the same names could be used in the directory/package, file/class, function/method and variable names. Never let the reader forget that this is smurfView or batController or whatever.

/sarcasm

[wodenokoto]

He doesn't advocate MVC. He says you should use whatever paradigm your team decides on, and if it happens to be MVC, then you should follow that paradigm and not scatter the M's, the V's and the C's all around.

[jameslk]

That's not what the OP is getting at. He's referring to the common file organization of projects where, for example, in MVC, the models are located under a models directory, the controllers under a controllers directory and the views under a views directory.

If I want to understand what the code does, looking over the code and seeing just a bunch of models or controllers is next to useless. Instead, the code should be organized semantically by the domains of the application. I should be able to look over the various directories and files and have a high level understanding of what the application does, not that it's just another MVC application.

This semantic organization also promotes encapsulation since only things related to each other are near each other, instead of scattered throughout many directories organized by arbitrary architectural concepts.