[jsn117]

and his only reward was international celebrity

[cdmckay]

And a high chance that one day they'll lock him up and throw away the key, Chelsea Manning-style.

[s_q_b]

That's the problem with defecting to a country without the rule of law. You're always a bargaining chip.

As soon as there is a sufficiently high value trade on the table, Putin will put him on a plane to the United States, without a moment's hesitation.

[ska]

What makes you believe things would be any different in a symmetric situation?

[s_q_b]

Once granted political asylum in the United States, it's virtually impossible to revoke. As much as pessimism is warranted, there are significant substantive differences between Russia and the United States.

[ska]

Oh, there are absolutely substantive differences, I wasn't claiming there was not.

However I imagine politically useful dissident might well be kept in an ambiguous status, if the perceived use as a bargaining chip later was high enough.

Really I was just objecting to the idea that the US is somehow above such shenanigans because of some sort of philosophically deep commitment to the "rule of law". Neither proposition holds much weight on evidence of actual behavior. Which isn't at all to say I believe the US is equally likely to engage in such behavior as Russia, mind you.

[jsn117]

never said that celebrity doesn't have a cost (a high one in this case) but there is an upside to his actions. Acknowledging so doesn't commit you to supporting one side or the other.

[Cyph0n]

And living out the rest of his life as a fugitive in exile. Sounds like a good deal.

[ludamad]

This is the ideal result if we want more like him to step forward.

[type0]

He should try to travel more, especially to muslim countries. Then we'll see how long it takes for him to be a victim of a drone strike.