|
|
|
|
|
by thebladerunner
3638 days ago
|
|
This is another variation of the Turing test. Time to realize: the Turing test is useless because: (a)the goal is to game the jury and (b) humans don't necessarily make sense either (example: bad or even just confusing poetry) so the human baseline is not always well-defined. Need Turing Test 2.0 |
|
My counterparty quickly made some bizarre grammatical errors, prompting me to guess "chatbot" and be rewarded with a screen saying "No, you fool! See, telling the difference is harder than you think!"
Telling the difference between a robot and a human pretending to be that robot is apparently viewed as a Turing test, but it isn't actually the same thing.
Similarly, there's a Turing test that's run every year with very strict rules on what you can and can't say to the other side. This defeats the idea of the test (while making the event less nonsensical, in that the rules allow for people to misidentify chatbots some of the time).
I guess my point is, your point (a) is an artifact of a certain culture that's trying to appropriate the concept of a Turing test so that they can declare they've beaten it. Point (b) is better.