This is probably my US-centrism talking, but it seems like the title could be updated to reflect that this is India's Supreme Court, not the US Supreme Court.
I'm tempted to agree, but if we consider the domain part of the title (which we do), it already says India. And it's good for HN readers to have to work a little.
FWIW the domain is in a smaller font with lower contrast than the title. I would guess that a lot of people automatically skip over the domain when they read hacker news headlines, because it's less legible than the title and feels distinct.
All true, but we also need to get out of the habit of consuming only the most easily scannable information.
As Kahneman explains in "Thinking Fast and Slow", System 2 (the reflective system, the one we want to be working a little on HN) is lazy and prefers to rely on System 1 (the reflexive one that deals in subsecond responses). I think the protests of HN readers when a title isn't trivially digestible or doesn't quite match expectations are largely the grumbling of System 2 that it needs to get up and move around a bit. And that's actually good for us—not the grumbling, but the working a bit. So the expectation to have titles spell everything out is a mildly bad thing and it's salutary to thwart it a little now and then.
Btw it was Alan Kay who pointed out the analogy between Kahneman and the reflexive/reflective distinction I've been using to try to understand the dynamics of HN. That was a helpful observation on Alan's part that among other things spurred me to take Kahneman back off the shelf.