[Annatar]

The truth is always uncivil; and as for unsubstantive, what I wrote can be easily corroborated by any history book.

The English left the EU, and they caused a mess, as usual. They believe that they are special, that EU norms, standards and regulations and laws do not apply or should not apply to them, and you have the nerve to label me uncivil for pointing out that they did this en masse before in history? By the by, the parent topic is "UK votes to leave EU" and wouldn't you know it, that is a purely political subject.

[dang]

> and they caused a mess, as usual

This is an example of how your posts are uncivil. It's not a factual observation, but a passive-aggressive potshot at an entire population. So is "They believe that they are special".

If you do this again, we will ban your account.

[tomhoward]

HN is not a place for heated, partisan political arguments. Not now, not ever, no matter the topic.

True, this is a political topic. As such it would normally be killed, but occasionally exceptions are made in cases like this where an event is of unusual historical or cultural significance.

But commenters aren't suddenly given license to engage in boorish behaviour just because a political topic is given a rare green light.

Indeed the reverse should be the case; extra effort should be made to contribute respectfully and substantively in discussions over topics like this. Lest the mods deem that this community is incapable of discussing any political topic with intelligence, and that all political topics should be banned in future, no matter how significant.

Plenty of other places on the internet welcome heated, partisan political arguing. There's no need to do it here.

[Chris2048]

> what I wrote can be easily corroborated by any history book

But it's up to you to properly cite. And what you wrote was vague.

You didn't even mention which was your country, though I expect this was intentional: this is not how you reply with substance.