|
|
|
|
|
by teraflop
3652 days ago
|
|
Copy-and-pasting an interesting response from user Asooka, who is hellbanned for no obvious reason: > I guess it has a bit to do with Nintendo's choice of architecture. They haven't moved past the Gamecube architecture - the Gamecube, Wii and WiiU all use the same PowerPC CPU, the Wii is just faster and the WiiU has two. Same for the GPU - they keep using pretty much the same Radeon, just newer, faster, etc. This has allowed the project to remain relevant (able to play mostly current games) for three console generations and find the support of qualified individuals. > I agree that it's a bit weird though - the best, most well managed emulators seem to be for Nintendo hardware. From the NES through to the Wii (and I expect Dolphin to support WiiU soon), every console is reasonably well supported and emulated. > Part of it might be due to Nintendo picking architectures that aren't too alien to emulate on a standard PC. |
|