|
|
|
|
|
by JaRail
3654 days ago
|
|
This is * not based on observed user behavior * not reproducible by you (recorded/replayed network where possible) * not reproducible by peers * in stark contrast to reproducible tests provided by others You describe it as "highly scientific" and jump straight to a marketing campaign. Honestly, who's skipping a lap of the race? It's pretty clear the data generated is useful from an engineering point of view. It can help identify problem areas. It's also absolutely clear that the conclusions being marketed are blatant misrepresentations of the work. |
|