[thinkMOAR]

Why is regular FTP even supported for so called secure storage?

So far it reads as secure 'because we say it is secure'? I find the whole idea of putting your data on hardware other control and still consider it 'secure' a bit strange. Though that might be just my twisted mind.

Also note they charge for internal traffic (and im not sure if you can measure these yourself to make sure the invoice is correct.):

"An operation is an action between your temporary safe-deposit box and C14 infrastructure: Archiving, Unarchiving, Destruction or Verification. Transactions are billed according to the volume of data to be processed at a price of € 0.01 / GB"

Do your math before simply signing up, my penny.

[mikmak]

the FTP is actually TLS enabled

Mik (Online.net staff)

[davidcelis]

so why not say FTPS?