|
|
|
|
|
by alankay1
3654 days ago
|
|
The question is whether a "message" has enough "stuff" to reify into a real process (so it can help interpretation and negotiation) or whether the receiver has to do all the work (and thus perhaps has to know too much for graceful scaling of the system). |
|
- what if we cant send processes instead of messages? - what are we missing? - which things cannot be done?
Pretty much what we have nowadays.
I find it hard to understand how sending processes (assuming they're not only objects but the context in which they live) help scaling the system.
Which example are you thinking of, that i cannot because I'm lacking this idea of processes rather than messages?