[dalke]

I've a pet peeve. Many people seems to think that "now" is high-tech and advanced. And it is. But many of the intermediate stages were also high-tech and advanced.

For example, people know say they are overwhelmed by "Big Data". But historically that's been the case since at least the 1940s, with people expressing how they can't keep up with the "torrents of information and data" that created an "information explosion."

So when you wrote: "a bit of it has to do with the manufacturing sector. The 'industrial revolution' in it's beginnings was quite crude really.", you managed to trigge that peeve.

Yes, the article mentioned your first point. But no, the late 1800s were well after the beginnings, and no longer "quite crude." Nor was 'space age technology' a driving factor against the conversion; most of the opposition to the Metric Conversion Act was social.

Otherwise, what prevents the US from switching from F to C, at the very least?