[zzzzzzzza]

You don't need hiking boots to go on a hike, do you need an evening jacket to go to a dinner? Could you just make do with one suit? I live in a fairly minimalist style. In my experience you trade one set of experiences for another. Personally I prefer the set of experiences I get, they seem more "authentic".

[chrisseaton]

You don't need boots for a stroll in the woods, but I'd hate to think 'that looks like a fun mountain to go up, but it wouldn't be responsible as I may break an ankle in these soft shoes'.

And you can turn up at people's parties dressed however you want, but they may not invite you again if you disrespect them by ignoring a reasonable dress code.

So yes I see you're trading experiences.

Where is the line between minimalism and simply being inappropriately dressed and ill-equipped.

[supermatt]

"For traversing steep, rugged terrain you need strong flexible ankles and light, flexible footwear. Doing exercises to strengthen your ankles is better than splinting them in heavy, rigid boots."

- Chris Townsend. Author of "The Backpackers Handbook"

[icebraining]

From pictures, he still uses boots, just lighter ones. I'm pretty sure you'd struggle fitting these in a suitcase: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-kQ4fJrh8wBk/U1FeF6moB2I/AAAAAAAAFn...

[mantas]

Fun thing is, if you do smth a lot, you get accustomed to it and you need much support from gear. But if you do smth just occasionally, every small bit helps to enjoy the experience and avoid injuries.

In the above example, occasional hiker would be much better off with good hiking shoes. While a well-seasoned one could do same hike in dress shoes, sneakers or whatever. On the other hand, a seasoned hiker is more likely to have the good shoes and use them just for the sake of comfort and safety.