|
|
|
|
|
by chongli
3655 days ago
|
|
I don't see why Apple couldn't just recommend that their pro users who have need of this sort of data integrity locally run their own server with FreeBSD + ZFS. Apple has really backed off on their attempts to market OS X Server to this crowd. Heck, they're probably using FreeBSD already if they need that much data integrity. |
|
Literally nobody wants their files to be silently corrupted. ZFS made it much easier for (nerds like us) to attain very high levels of data integrity.
APFS was (and maybe still is?) a chance to make that the default for regular people.