|
|
|
|
|
|
by vegabook
3659 days ago
|
|
|
How are there better alternatives if they don't have Ubuntu's "large number of community solutions"? Are we talking "better" for Unix/Linux old-guard purist-reactionaries? Or for people who want a server that just works? I personally just stick to Ubuntu because, on most of the software I download, there are usually explicit setup instructions for Ubuntu, and then "other Linux". Life is too short. Ubuntu is the path of least resistance and let's be honest, it works. By the way, while I'm not sure about this trademark thing, I personally want Canonical to be a profitable and stable company that can continue to invest, and that will be around for a long time. We can't leave all the Linux money to Redhat. |
|
|