|
|
|
|
|
by slgeorge
3656 days ago
|
|
- Stop publicly promising salary increases altogether. Promote people based on their ability, not an artificial loyalty policy. Some people deserve 10%+ raises, some you'll find are overpaid. Use a basic job ladder and put the burden on managers to justify comp changes. A guarantee of annual salary increases is problematic for three reasons: a. An increase of 3-5% is going to increase salary costs rapidly as it compounds. He mentions that salary is 80% of cost, so it means that costs are going up for doing the _same thing_ by 3-5% every year. Employees aren't a fixed unit of production (particularly in a tech firm) but there's not unlimited new productivity either. It's fine if your prices are also growing at those rates ... but I don't think many people are in those situations at the moment. b. It takes away the meritocracy
Salaries have to keep up with inflation, but beyond should be a mark of performance. c. It's going to suck when they have to change it
Things happen, this is an example, and employee morale is a sensitive matter. |
|