It's annoyingly common how the OP doesn't mark this answer as accepted, or even acknowledge how amazing this answer is from one of the technology's creators -- instead just goes on to ask a followup.
Plus, often there is a decent and accepted answer given quickly and then a much more complete answer given later on that is really the one that should be considered in the archive.
For example, suppose I ask a question, and within 10 minutes get an answer which is good enough for me, then I accept it and move on.
Hours later, someone gives a much better answer. What is my obligation to track the topic after I already know a correct answer? What should be the mechanism to override my acceptance?
What is more achievable: putting that mechanism in place, or getting beginning programmers to look at the first answer rather than looking for the accepted one?
To which I'll add, I'm looking at it in privacy mode (not logged in), and can't tell which is accepted. Is that something that only people with an account can see? If so, aren't those also people who are now no longer beginner SO users?