|
|
|
|
|
by cpa
3660 days ago
|
|
Totally agree. Which interpretation is correct is a decision for the Ethereum community to make (or whoever is in charge, I don't know muck about the governance). From the article:
> The development community is proposing a soft fork, (with NO ROLLBACK; no transactions or blocks will be “reversed”) […] preventing the ether from being withdrawn by the attacker […]. This will later be followed up by a hard fork which will give token holders the ability to recover their ether. We'll see how the community reacts! |
|