[nikdaheratik]

All good points, but I believe the goal of the article was to try and survey all the tech changes that have been happening in Ag the past 10-15 years and it was already pushing the word cap for a single magazine article. I suppose if they had skipped genetics, aquaculture, and maybe underground gardening they would have had more room to focus on soil and plants. But that may have been a different kind of article at that point.

[repliculture]

I agree that they were going for more of a survey of recent developments approach, but my perception is that they consistently overemphasize the tech as a panacea. Unfortunately that occurs quite often when tech solutions are presented - proponents address one component of the greater agricultural sustainability question but ignore all other factors. In the case of agroecosystems, those factors are incredibly relevant. that said, I definitely acknowledge your point about the word count.