[drzaiusapelord]

No, it means we understand there are theoretical security issues with global variables, but cannot determine if they're actually applicable or exploitable in this software.

[MustardTiger]

You just repeated exactly the same thing he said as if you were disagreeing.

[richardwhiuk]

A theoretical security vulnerability isn't really a think - it's just a bug. Either it's exploitable, and thus a security vulnerability, or it's a bug and isn't,

[MustardTiger]

Yes it is. It is a bug, that may be exploitable. There's no contradiction there.

[coldtea]

Global variables are not bugs -- at worse they are bad style and can cause bugs.

As for your other comments, there's this "burden of proof" thing.

[MustardTiger]

Did you reply to the wrong comment by mistake? What other comments? What are you talking about?