|
|
|
|
|
by jagbolanos
3662 days ago
|
|
I've been talking with people involved in elections in Honduras and they explained a technique that is normally used for paper ballots. It's called "La Cadena" (the chain) and it works like this. A person goes to the voting center and gets a ballot
That person goes to the booth and marks the ballot
That person skips entering their ballot and goes out
Shows the ballot to the coercer, verifying the vote
The coercer gives the ballot to the next person
The next person gets another ballot and has the previous one hidden.
That person introduces the new ballot, hides the old one and goes out.
And the chain goes on. Apparently it's a common way to coerce votes in low income urban areas and rural areas. You only need distraction or complicity from a person from the voting table and it's hard to detect. Another common issue is vote stuffing. On the philosophical part, it is in the end a human problem, but with technology at least you should reduce the possibility of cheating |
|
Complicity is always going to be hard to work around (it's the primary fault vector of electronic voting), but it seems 'the chain' wouldn't be too difficult to detect - the standover men would have to farm the ballots from the outgoing people and get them back into the line going in (but again, complicity to look the other way...)
Vote stuffing is easy to workaround - have the ballot papers custom-marked as they're handed out.
> technology at least you should reduce the possibility of cheating
Technology also opens up lots of new avenues for cheating. It also has the problem of not being understandable by the layperson if they have to manage it in any way at all.