|
|
|
|
|
by titzer
3666 days ago
|
|
You are postulating the existence of only a single universe, ours. But there could be any number of universes, and so far we have no scientific way of testing that. The anthropic principle and the possibility of multiple universes puts all probabilistic arguments to dust: anything with non-zero probability happens in an infinite number of universes. > A million monkeys typing on keyboards will eventually write shakespeare. But it will be longer than the universe before they even type a single sentence of it correctly. All it takes is _one_ tiny selection force to blow this argument out of the water. For example, if only _a single_ correct letter is retained from each attempt, the problem gets exponentially easier with every iteration, making the expected time to generate any work linear in its length. |
|