|
|
|
|
|
by banktaoe
3667 days ago
|
|
If they wanted to guarantee cash, they could've bought a collar by selling calls and buying puts. It would have a very small cost, and the deal's investment bankers could set it up, no problem. tl;dr: you're both extremely confident, ignorant, and wrong. |
|
- But options for multi-year expiries (because that is how long the disposal will take, after the obligatory lockup)...
- ... in a stock that is 1000x less liquid that your usual AAPL or GOOG...
- ...on a short notice on $325 million worth of stock, i.e. a huge percentage of the free float of the stock, making it impossible to hedge for any bank that offers the collar.
tldr: You are a bit too cocky given your lack of knowledge.