|
|
|
|
|
by ArkyBeagle
3662 days ago
|
|
But presumably some sort of bug would have. Broken is broken. If Rust correctly deduces the intent leading to the bad dereference, then it's REALLY GOOD! :) ( no snark; I hope you get my point ) Ironically, reliability is actually a value of merit with 'C'/C++ - in cases. It's just that the ways of doing that seem rather inaccessible these days, or the flow of people past seeing them is not working out. I don't think there will ever be a way around developing proper test vectors. It's quite interesting work but it tends to go unrewarded. |
|
Programming languages isn't just fashion, we invent them because we thing we can solve old problems in better ways.
Most of my co-workes doing C++ never even wanted to look at the alternatives. Being the only thing they have ever done, they don't even realize how bad it is. They have just internalized it.