[jdeeny]

As a C magician, rust provides too many clear improvements over C to ignore it. I certainly don't feel like I am 'throwing everything away and starting from zero,' as much of my C (and other language) knowledge transfers over to rust.

I'm not a C++ guru, but I think modern C++ is powerful enough that it doesn't feel lacking in features compared to rust, like C does. There is less of a draw for seasoned C++ programmers.

Rust seems to be gaining a lot of momentum and I am becoming more and more confident that it will be regarded as a major language for embedded and general systems programming and possibly even a successor to C.

[pjmlp]

For me C was already lacking when I got to learn it in 1992 , because by then I was quite comfortable with Turbo Pascal 6.0.

Just check the feature list and type safety differences. The only advantage from C was being less fragmented than Pascal dialects.

So I became a C++ hipster (if that would be a thing in the 90's).

We used to have the same heat from C guys that C# and other language users nowadays have from systems languages.

Hence why I am always supportive of new programming languages that target the same use cases.