Completely agree with this viewpoint. Explanatory power and reproducibility are two of the most important aspects of a scientific paper. Most deep learning based papers lack both these properties.
> Explanatory power and reproducibility are two of the most important aspects of a scientific paper.
The reproducability problem should be solvable if the authors would simply release the training data and source code that trains the network (as yould scientific practise would require). Or is there anything else that is necessary to assure reproducability (I'm not that deep into CV papers)?
The reproducability problem should be solvable if the authors would simply release the training data and source code that trains the network (as yould scientific practise would require). Or is there anything else that is necessary to assure reproducability (I'm not that deep into CV papers)?