|
|
|
|
|
by stevendhansen
3667 days ago
|
|
PID control is rarely used for professional servo applications, with the exception being amateur and lower performance systems (radio controlled, etc). This is especially true with PM servo motors because these machines are inherently nonlinear and cross-coupled. PID doesn't deal with either of these issues (nonlinearity or cross coupling) and therefore offers extremely limited performance. The industry standard update rate for servo systems is ~1kHz (although it depends on the application), and I have seen systems with >5kHz torque bandwidths. The torque dynamics associated with a typical PM machine used for servo systems are easily in the 10's or 100's of microseconds, so 60Hz control would not cut it. |
|
For example, KUKA robot arms can operate in a mode where a motion path is planned and a sensor on a tool tip can make slight adjustments to the motion path on the fly. The points on those motion paths (as well as corrections) are updated every 4 or 12ms (83.3 to 250 Hz).
My point is that servo motor drives do indeed implement (sophisticated) PID controllers for current, position, velocity control loops. (2)
Obligatory Defensive Writing:
(1) Typical industrial servo motors implement sophisticated control over the velocity and acceleration profiles of the point to point moves. Anyone interested can look up the DS402 standard and take a look at the motion profile modes of operation.
(2) The PID loops implemented in servo drives are way more sophisticated than the canonical PID control loop equation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PID_controller). Nonetheless anyone who finds themselves manually tuning the servo loops for an industrial servo motor will surely find themselves setting proportional and integral gains.
Source: Commissioning servo motor drives is a part of my job.