> The judge in my case was clear about a number of issues. First, the very definition of “espionage” is incredibly broad. Espionage is the act of “providing national defense information to any person not entitled to receive it.” Period. My judge also said that there did not have to be mens rea, or criminal intent, for there to be guilt in an espionage case. And the concept of “harm to the national security” was irrelevant.
--John Kiriakou (He was the first CIA officer to be convicted for passing classified information to a reporter) [1]
--John Kiriakou (He was the first CIA officer to be convicted for passing classified information to a reporter) [1]
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer.
[1] http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/all_whistleblowers_shoul...