|
|
|
|
|
by mjevans
3670 days ago
|
|
It's viable in all ways except political. People are scared by the phrase 'breeder reactor'; which is poor marketing, calling it a 'waste reduction reactor' is slightly longer, but also more accurately describes what it does and sounds a LOT better. I think it may have been a result of Fukushima, but I gained an interest in the topic and spent a few tens of hours researching. A proper waste reduction reactor produces three categories of radioactive material. * Stuff that is so crazy hot it'll cool off in a 'short' period of time. * Stuff that is good for use in reactors (a subset of the above). * Stuff that will take a LONG time to decay; which means that it is active, but very very slowly emitting. |
|