|
|
|
|
|
|
by stephenr
3667 days ago
|
|
|
Do you have reason to believe that they wouldn't have, or that they would do so, if it were GPL3+ licensed? Apple famously doesn't provide any "recent" GNU tools because they're GPL3+ licensed, when they were previously GPL2.x and less restrictive. |
|
|
Maybe, as a data point: how many of the manufacturers' contributions to Linux are MIT licensed, so that they can be picked up by *BSD as well?