Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by cm2187 3668 days ago
My point is that you wouldn't even need to smuggle it in the US, like you wouldn't even need to smuggle alcohol in the UK or pot in California.
3 comments

We do things differently here. As a result, we have only had one mass shooting incident in the last 20 years. Our per-capita murder rate is about 1/4 that of the US. We had three fatal police shootings last year, one in 2014 and none in 2013.

You might not like it, but we do. Our system of gun control is overwhelmingly popular.

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/VC.IHR.PSRC.P5 http://www.inquest.org.uk/statistics/fatal-police-shootings

I don't want to make it another gun control debate, but I do not think it is the prohibition of weapons that make shooting rares. Drugs are equally prohibited and are by no mean rare. Everyone has an assault riffle at home in Switzerland and I have never heard of a mass shooting there. I think it's more a behavioral thing than a gun law thing.
This may well be true. However, it's better to have a behavioral problem without guns than a behavioral problem with guns widely and easily available.
A drug dealer cannot legally import automatic firearms into the US.

The only way they could be imported is by a licensed dealer, for sale to the military or law enforcement.

It's likely you just meant to make a more generalized comparison of the laws, but most people wanting to import the weapons in that article into the US would need to smuggle them.

Alcohol is routinely smuggled into the UK.