[adekok]

> What has occurred between 710 and 720 is change.

As you note, the changes should be minimal. i.e. the versions should be compatible. By changing the names, you are creating massive change, in order to bludgeon users of your library with the knowledge that there might be minor changes in it.

This is counter-productive.

> Swapping a library version under the hood is by that view not good practise.

And re-naming everything is?

Please, get over yourself. Your practice runs counter to 40 years of computer engineering. There are hundreds of thousands of Open Source projects which keep consistent names across minor releases.

Either they're all wrong, every one of the millions of developers, or you are wrong.

I think my review ends here. You're clearly in the camp of "I know better than everyone else".