Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by userbinator 3674 days ago
It's interesting that the "gz" column, which reflects the amount of source code required, shows a very slight trend towards C being smaller, although there are big exceptions like regex-dna and reverse-complement.

I'm not seeing the 400x more memory - there is a 40x though. But if you add up the columns for the programs that have both C and Java versions, you get this rough summary...

           secs    KB       gz
    Java   76.33   2004048  12775
    C gcc  37.32   793652   11651
...that Java is on average half as fast as C and uses 2.5x more memory, while requiring slightly more source code.
2 comments
igouy 3669 days ago
>> more memory

http://programmers.stackexchange.com/a/189552/4334

link
pvg 3674 days ago
"half as fast as C and 2.5x the memory on average" is a stupendously good result for any managed runtime. Most don't get anywhere near it while providing more than acceptable performance in practice.
link
MrBuddyCasino 3674 days ago
Yes, and 2.5x is something that can be dealt with by deploying beefier hardware. The productivity gain is what makes that tradeoff a no-brainer.
link