[gh-lfneu28]

From the article: "Historically, news publications have treated certain subjects very carefully: if you’re rich and [...] litigious, then [...] organizations will have lawyers do a careful review of anything they write about you [...]"

Well, if they would now have to "do a careful review" of everything they write for the fear of vengeful billionaire going after them, nobody would shed a tear.

But obviously that wont be a solution.

[pervycreeper]

He seems to be saying that vetting info about people who are not known to have enough resources to pursue legal remedy themselves is too large a hardship for journalists to endure. In all of the voluminous writing about this topic this week, I have yet to encounter a single good objection to what Thiel is doing. I'm honestly mystified by why so many people are objecting to this.

[internaut]

There are no good logical or legal arguments that I've heard so far. It's all hand waving furiously.

[shrewduser]

It's scummy journalists all circling the wagons as they feel one of their own is under attack.

that's why you won't find logical or reasonable arguments from them.