Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nitwit005 3682 days ago
No, they just need to explain why other projects are better things to spend money on.

Given the history of poor results so far, that's probably not as difficult to do as you're imagining.

1 comments

The parent post wasn't making a statement about why planners should be funding the smaller projects, they were making a statement about planners who were ignoring fusion of any form in plans about power mixes and civil engineering 10, 20 or 30 years from now. Much like how some people criticize some departments of transportation for not addressing driverless cars/transit in a plan stretching out til 2025, say.