|
|
|
|
|
|
by JumpCrisscross
3677 days ago
|
|
|
The difference being Gigster is offering a portfolio. Granted the "everyone shares in 1%" part makes it economically immaterial. What's needed is a collaborative investment management platform for freelancers. For example. twenty freelancers could make an agreement pursuant to which they each (a) reasonably demand equity alongside pay for their work, (b) contribute all equity they earn in exchange for services to a fund co-controlled by the others and (c) share in the fund either equally or proportionally to their contributions/the performance of their contributions (e.g. contributor gets 20% and the remaining 19 split the 80%). This is a healthier financial structure than having bigger, but more concentrated, stakes ceteris paribus. |
|
|