|
|
|
|
|
|
by RobertKerans
3682 days ago
|
|
|
Why do you want it to be anonymous in this context? I get you can drop the `return`, but I don't see how you gain anything (apart from a tiny reduction typing and a small increase in incomprehensibility) by using anonymous functions to define components (I know the pattern is used a lot in the wild, but there seems to be zero reasoning for it; lexical binding isn't really relevant here) |
|
|