|
|
|
|
|
by lomnakkus
3678 days ago
|
|
Hm? My point was that the spec doesn't fundamentally change anything wrt. the things you mentioned, so it should be evaluated on other merits (or lack thereof). Doing ad-hoc hacks around the lack of cancellation seems like a pretty big practical issue to me[1], so I'd certainly like to see something like this spec in the standard. (Note: something like, not necessarily exactly this. I haven't thought about it deeply enough to be able to properly evaluate the spec.) [1] Happens all the time when doing simple Ajax-on-futures where you really just want to ignore any result if the operation gets canceled in the UI before the response arrives. |
|