|
|
|
|
|
by tanker
3677 days ago
|
|
I think the organic material idea is good, but not at a distant collection point. If you throw organic material away --> transport to site --> sort it --> delay --> transport to stores --> transport back to garden
I think you lose the energy battle. If you created local dump sites where trash could be sorted and composted, it could work. You also cut down on the amount (and as a result the energy) of trash that gets thrown in the dump. Obvious obstacles are the inability to get people to use the local sites, the initial costs / availability of land, and the resistance to dumps in neighborhoods. A potential 2nd level effect would be the long term state of trash dumps. At least some dumps are eventually reclaimed. Would reducing or eliminating the organic content prevent that from happening? |
|
Then you have places like Florida, where nobody recycles. Trash is trash. Throw it away and take it to the curb. Even the most elegant and energy-efficient local dump system would go nowhere with a culture that would rather throw away and forget about it, and this is coming from a state that is most vulnerable to climate change yet is full of beach house-owning republicans who think climate change is a hoax.