|
|
|
|
|
|
by p4wnc6
3681 days ago
|
|
|
> That's not the most damning criticism in the article though. The most damning is that they seem to have copied entire paragraphs off Wikipedia, which suggests they have some kind of infantile understanding of science. I agree about this. If the other article had been about this and a small amount about the continually beaten dead horse of qualifying your research (or qualifying media headlines) with caveats and assumptions, then it would have been reasonable. |
|
|