[chrismonsanto]

> To be fair, the top comment here calls out Poe's Law.

The top comment when I posted was a copypaste of the joke disclaimer. And the top reply to the top comment at the time of this posting is a copypaste of the joke disclaimer.

> Many - possibly most! - people really don't look that deeply into things and tend to take stuff at face value (or don't know that there is a deeper meaning to spot), no matter how outlandish.

If someone can't figure out why generating a CSS class for every (property, value) combination is funny, then I don't think an explanation will help. Maybe it will give those readers an A-ha! moment and a valuable life lesson, but it won't be funny for them.

> All that as a mea culpa, as I read the OP's README and thought, "man, that seems like a bit of a mess... under what circumstances would you need to do that?"

If you got rused then that's great. The joke did what it was supposed to do. What sucks is that people who instinctively click the comments first won't get that experience, because some killjoy had to post "IT'S A JOKE DON'T FALL FOR THIS."