|
|
|
|
|
by dragonwriter
3687 days ago
|
|
> That is the disaster, worst-possible outcome from a trial so there would be absolutely no reason to settle for that amount. Not entirely true: the disaster, worst-possible outcome from the trial is that plus an order to pay the other sides costs, plus having racked up a bunch of your own costs. Which is why one might, conceivably settle for that without the expense and delay of trial. |
|