Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mamon 3686 days ago
Which is why I am against trials with jury. Professional judges are much less likely to fall for lawyer's "bullshiting skill".
2 comments

That seems like a stretch. Judges routinely make questionable rulings. Heck, in this case Alsup did a great job in the first (jury) trial .... and then Oracle appealed and the original decision, which I thought was right, was overturned by judges.
Then judges just become targets for corruption, leverage and political capture.
Yep, that's the idea: You're tried by a "jury of your peers" so you can't claim that you were fitted out by the aristocracy ... at least in theory
Sure, but there are ways around that.