Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
mamon
3686 days ago
Which is why I am against trials with jury. Professional judges are much less likely to fall for lawyer's "bullshiting skill".
2 comments
sievebrain
3686 days ago
That seems like a stretch. Judges routinely make questionable rulings. Heck, in this case Alsup did a great job in the first (jury) trial .... and then Oracle appealed and the original decision, which I thought was right, was overturned by judges.
link
simonh
3686 days ago
Then judges just become targets for corruption, leverage and political capture.
link
ricksplat
3686 days ago
Yep, that's the idea: You're tried by a "jury of your peers" so you can't claim that you were fitted out by the aristocracy ... at least in theory
link
lmm
3686 days ago
Sure, but there are ways around that.
link