[dang]

I don't think bringing out a list of generically outrageous things someone said in the past rises to the level of discourse we're trying for here.

We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11727718 and marked it off-topic.

[lkrubner]

The man has a long history of writing angry rants. You don't think that would influence how people might read his current rant? You don't think the readers of Hacker News might like to know about his past history of similar behavior? You don't think it helps interpret the level of anger in his current rant?

[dang]

I do think all those things. But the cost of moving in the direction of personal vendettas or witch hunts is higher than the benefits you listed (if benefits they are).

I don't mean that's what you intended, but that's the direction it points in, which it isn't in the long-term interests of HN to allow.