|
|
|
|
|
by staticautomatic
3687 days ago
|
|
I think the real issue is that they're administering a test with an apparently high false positive rate and then using that as a basis for depriving both child and mother of interaction and making an already difficult process much worse. I find the hospital's conduct reprehensible if they knew or should have known that a false positive was eminently possible, if not likely based on some OTC drug the mother may have taken. I myself would file a lawsuit for negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress, which would likely make it past a motion to dismiss and result in a settlement. And yes, I work on high stakes lawsuits for a living. |
|