|
|
|
|
|
by kuschku
3687 days ago
|
|
> when they can just use their car, get there in about the same time > HSR is not, it's slow Have you ever seen an actual HSR system? We’re talking about 220mph minimum. That’s quite a bit faster than per car. And, due to TSA, it’s faster than an airplane, and without the annoying stuff. And cheaper. Hyperloops only differences over HSR is that it’s 15min faster, is a lot more uncomfortable, a lot more expensive to build, a lot more expensive to use (due to few people per capsule), etc. |
|
Sorry, that's complete bullshit.
We're not talking about HSR in Japan, China, or Germany here. We're talking about "HSR" in California, USA.
The California system will be very, very lucky if it manages to ever hit 200mph in a short stretch. Realistically, it might be about the speed of the Amtrak Acela Express, which is basically no faster than any regular train, except that it manages to hit 150mph once or twice, briefly.
You seem to be making the ridiculous assumption that HSR in America will resemble HSR in other countries somehow, in both speed and cost. Nothing could be farther from the truth. HSR here is a horribly expensive boondoggle. It'll be worse than the F-35.