|
|
|
|
|
|
by cnp
3685 days ago
|
|
|
> That's not to say there aren't any potential health benefits but "toking herb" (or whatever) isn't the best way to present them to people who still demonize it > Whenever pot-culture words come up in "reporting" about medical treatments I immediately tune out Ever think that you're contributing to the problem? Just ignore the editorializing. |
|
|
How? The articles aren't for me. I'm fine with pot being legal for medical purposes or otherwise. The articles usually seemed to be aimed at (probably older) people who think marijuana is the devil's weed, and using stoner slang as part of an article to illustrate the positive side effects is counterproductive, in my opinion. Why does it matter if I ignore the article at that point?