|
|
|
|
|
|
by candu
3690 days ago
|
|
|
Coming from a background that includes some experience with C / C++, `const` here works as I expect it to. I'd prefer `const` even for the object reference case: I get errors on reassignment this way, and presumably it makes additional optimizations possible. To each their own, I suppose :) There's also `Object.defineProperty()`, `Object.freeze()` for more control over mutability. |
|
|