|
|
|
|
|
by eggy
3692 days ago
|
|
I am pleased they took the time to respond in length. It makes a bit more sense now (NDAs, hardware manufacturers, etc...) vs. the 'security by obscurity' mantra prevalent in the replies. I have had my own business, and the one thing I would say to the critics of Yubico: If you have a way, given existing hardware and software tools and suppliers, to do a better job, step up and do it. AFAIK, Apple didn't opensource their hardware related to crypto, or their software. I think you will find it takes more than wishful thinking; more like, put your money ( = or your time) where your mouth is. Engineers, and I don't just mean CI engineers here, know it is a long way from a math equation or set of equations to a real world working object. I would love to see, and I would contribute money to an opensource solution. I just don't think it is as cookie-cutter simple as the majority of comments seem to intimate on this forum. |
|