[FordPrefectAO]

If you follow the links to get to the dataset (for instance to see if you're in it), you arrive here[1], which says

  Unavailable For Legal Reasons
  This record has been suspended

[1] https://osf.io/p9ixw/

[oneloop]

Yes, because the guy has already started feeling the heat.

[minimaxir]

Another article said OKC did file a legitimate takedown with the data repository host, and they complied.

[gohrt]

"legitimate"? Is UGC copyrighted by the platform host?

[toomuchtodo]

It's most likely licensed by the user to the host (through a ToS), and the host has the ability to use that license to submit takedown notices of their collective database (which is how US copyright law works).

Good!

[pbhjpbhj]

> use that license to submit takedown notices of their collective database (which is how US copyright law works) //

It would be contract law based on the click-wrap/T&Cs of the website wouldn't it? Copyright doesn't cover facts, only their arrangement; ergo as long as he didn't copy the way the content had been presented he would apparently be clear of copyright infringement.

In Europe we have database rights law too, is there an equivalent in the USA?

[toomuchtodo]

I don't believe user profiles are going to be considered facts, but creative works. OKCupid's corpus as a whole would be protected as a database, but the individual profiles would not be considered facts.

[MasterScrat]

The draft paper is not reachable anymore either.