Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dredmorbius 3688 days ago
You're right. I'd underestimated crossing times, though prevailing winds also cut time to as little as 43 hours eastward. From Wikipedia's page on the Hindenberg (unattributed):

"The ten westward trips that season took 53 to 78 hours and eastward took 43 to 61 hours."

Given that high-speed land-based rail would be an option, the ferry-to-rail option seems a strong contender, actually.

Remember: the whole concept of moving any significant distance at a rate of more than a few miles an hour is quite modern.