|
|
|
|
|
|
by nickpsecurity
3694 days ago
|
|
|
Hmm. That's a good point. It didn't benchmark as well as Common LISP last I looked. Another time, Racket developers updated the compiler and improved a benchmark on a spot due to complaints on a forum. I rarely see that haha. It would still have to be tested to ensure performance is within what you need. "I'm also quite partial to Lisp's condition system" You're not the only one. Many like that. It's been a while since I used Common LISP. Here's Racket's condition system or a brief intro to it below. Is there anything specific that it seems weaker on? https://docs.racket-lang.org/r6rs/r6rs-lib-std/r6rs-lib-Z-H-... |
|
|